Victoria Laundry Ltd V Newman Industries Ltd

Victoria Laundry Ltd V Newman Industries Ltd. Facts Newman Industries Ltd was meant to deliver a boiler for Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd The delivery was five months late As a result of not having enough laundry capacity Victoria Laundry lost a lucrative cleaning contract from the Ministry of SupplyVictoria Laundry sued for the ordinary profit that it had forgone through not having the boiler on time.

Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528 is an English contract law case on the remoteness of damage principle.

Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries LawTeacher.net

Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd[1949] 2 KB 528 is an English contract lawcase on the remotenessof damage principle Contents Facts Judgment See also Notes Facts Newman Industries Ltd was meant to deliver a boiler for Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd The delivery was five months late.

[Case Law Contract] ['reasonable foreseeability YouTube

5 minutes know interesting legal mattersVictoria Laundry Ltd v Newman Industries [1949] 2 KB 528 (UK Caselaw).

Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd

Victoria Laundry Ltd (VLL) ordered a large boiler from Newman Industries Ltd (NIL) in contemplation of some lucrative dyeing contracts NIL were aware of the nature of VLL’s business and that it was intended for the boiler to be put to use as soon as possible The delivery of the boiler was delayed by five months and VLL claimed forIssuesDecision/OutcomeVLL claimed damages for their lost profits caused by the delay They argued losses which would reasonably foreseeably flow from the breach would be recoverable and therefore since NIL knew the boiler was required as soon as possible for business purposes they must have contemplate.